A global warming non-believer has a letter in Thursday's Spokesman-Review. Nothing new about that. But the writer makes the huge blunder of pointing to the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine's website www.oism.org as a good place to research the issue. This is a quack institute in the Oregon boondocks. Check it out on SourceWatch, or any other fair minded evaluator. I know, the people at SourceWatch are environmentalists but they are also reasonable, which is more than I can say about the folks at OISM. Why does the Spokesman not screen these sources.? The idea must go that any "Institute" with a URL has something valuable to say.